Welcome to Early Independence Award (EIA) Moderated Forum

by Administrator 30 December 2010 11:09

The new NIH Director’s Early Independence Award (EIA) program is designed to help exceptional junior investigators leapfrog over traditional post-doctoral training and move into independent academic positions at U.S. institutions, directly upon completion of their graduate research degrees.

The NIH expects to issue up to 10 awards in fall 2011. To apply for these awards, outstanding junior investigators must identify a host institution. Alternatively, institutions may actively recruit exceptional junior scientists to apply for these positions. These awards will be very selective, and each institution may only submit up to two applications. EIA recipients will receive up to $250,000 in direct costs per year for up to five years for research that complements and enhances an institution's research program. 

The Funding Opportunity Announcement may be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-RM-10-019.html

 

The deadline for submitting Early Independence Award applications is January 21, 2011.  Letters of intent are due December 21, 2010..

Tags:

Comments (6)

Comments

11/17/2010 2:45:07 PM #

Could you describe the differences between the early independence award and the K-award and how the goals of the two programs differ?
Thank you.

alicia.doyle@tufts.edu United States | Reply

11/19/2010 5:21:00 PM #

The Early Independence Award (DP5) program has a very specific objective, which is to identify and support those exceptional individuals who would benefit by having an independent research position directly after completion of the terminal doctorate or clinical residency. It is not directed towards the large majority of young researchers who would be better served by doing a post-doctoral or clinical fellowship.  

The K-Awards are career development awards that serve a variety of purposes ranging from support of junior scientists during the transition to an independent position to support of senior scientists who wish to have “protected” time to mentor junior scientists. The different NIH institutes may also use the same K -Award for different specific objectives. To find which one may be most appropriate for you, consult the K-Award kiosk at grants.nih.gov/.../careerdevelopmentawards.htm  and the Career Award Wizard at http://grants.nih.gov/training/kwizard/index.htm. Many of the K-Awards for junior scientists require a particular mentor to be specified, seek individuals with particular backgrounds, and expect post-doctoral training.

earlyindependence@mail.nih.gov United States | Reply

12/2/2010 11:23:30 PM #

Hi, I have been chosen by my host institution as a candidate to compete for DP5 award. I have a question regarding the proposal. Is the requirement for preliminary data in the proposal similar to that for other NIH proposals, like R01/R21? (It is common nowadays that a success R01 proposal contains at least 50% data ready for publish.) I am considering to explore a new subject if I am awarded, so I can only provide minimal preliminary data in the proposal...Will this be a disadvantage?

lmwang83@gmail.com United States | Reply

12/7/2010 4:20:31 PM #

The expectations for preliminary data are less than that for traditional R01 applications. The reviewers will understand that the candidates have recently completed or will soon complete their doctoral degree/clinical residency and so will not have had the opportunity to amass large amounts of supporting data. Particular emphasis in review of applications will be given to the strengths and potential of the candidate, as well as the strengths (available instrumentation, research infrastructure, existing scientific expertise, etc.) and commitment of the host institution to the candidate. By the way, though the expectations for preliminary results in a conventional R01 may seem high, they are not quite at the level of having half of the proposed research ready for publication.

earlyindependence@mail.nih.gov United States | Reply

12/28/2010 10:04:16 AM #

Hi, I would like to compete for the DP5 award, as I will defend my PhD thesis by March 2011.  My question is in reference to the "highly productive" description of a good candidate for this award.  I currently have only 2 publications, neither of those as first author, and am submitting 3 manuscripts as I complete my dissertation.  It is unfortunate that the productivity and "success" of doctoral students are largely determined by the support of their research mentor(s), and may not truly reflect the actual capabilities of the students, themselves.  It seems the very spirit of this particular award recognizes innovation and ambition in a new researcher can be hampered by the inability of that researcher to make important decisions regarding the research.  If an ambitious candidate with a relatively weak publication history can demonstrate strong institutional support and present a creative and feasible research proposal, how badly will this candidate suffer competitive disadvantage due to paucity of publications accumulated as a student?

molecularbiochem@gmail.com United States | Reply

12/30/2010 11:05:14 AM #

A strong candidate is one who has outstanding capacity and drive to pursue independent research.  The reviewers will appreciate that not all outstanding candidates will have had the opportunity to amass a stellar publication record and that a stellar publication record, in itself, does not necessarily indicate that candidate has the necessary qualities to be an independent researcher. Therefore, the reviewers will also use other information, such as the content of the reference letters, to assess the qualities of the candidate.

earlyindependence@mail.nih.gov United States | Reply

Add comment




  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



This page last reviewed: November 8, 2010